NOSTALGIA ISN’T WHAT IT USED TO BE—PART TWO

Duda Owner IONOS • November 17, 2015

No one argues that nostalgia is reflecting upon the past. How accurately we remember things can vary. Memory lapses and selective memory both can misrepresent yesterday’s realities. Robert Trussell gives a great example of this in his citation of a modern HBO series (“Awash in Nostalgia” The Kansas City Star . November 15, 2015, pp. 1D, 12D):

A more recent western, HBO’s ‘Deadwood,’ was nominally set in the 1870s. The buildings and costumes and muddy sets looked right, but the unrelenting R-rated dialogue and plotlines about competing business interests made it feel more like ‘The Sopranos’ than ‘Gunsmoke.’

‘Deadwood’ was definitely its own animal, but like many series and movies, it tapped into our cultural memory of both a real and an imaginary past. Historical movies usually have less to do with the era they depict than the era in which they are made. ” (p. 12D)

I once read:

No one can change the past, except of course the historian.

This is why I stand with Trussell in the fact that historical productions often show more evidence of the era in which they are made than of the era they depict. This may not always be the case, but in my observations, I think that it is. We reapproach a bygone era, grounded by the present, and look for a way in which the bygone era can be seen freshly.

If this reapproach has validity, I think that is fine. Everyone’s knowledge may increase. On the other hand, if this reapproach is not valid, then we risk misrepresenting the truth. That is not necessarily a cause for concern as long as everyone recognizes that this is entertainment. Even productions based on true stories often disclose that some content has been created for the sake of the overall drama, story, and plotline.

Most importantly to me is that the viewer does the homework. After all, if you are going to give up hours of your time to enjoy a program, don’t you owe it to yourself to at least determine what is true and what is not? Let the “buyer” beware is applicable here just as much as anywhere.

By James Meadows July 13, 2026
What every front desk professional should know about credit card surcharging
By James Meadows September 7, 2025
Is a college degree still worth the investment? It depends of the path you craft.
By James Meadows August 12, 2025
You need to give serious thought to taming the tiger before you are in its cage.
By James Meadows June 8, 2025
My transparent reflection about my five-year post-layoff experience, how I navigated it, learned through it, and identified some wisdom that might inspire others.
By James Meadows June 29, 2024
The earliest days of this series present fundamentally significant leadership content.
By James Meadows August 22, 2023
What we should expect from fidelity to science.
Honesty, honest,  honestly
By James Meadows August 9, 2023
We explore the overuse or inappropriate use of the words "honest," "honesty," and "honestly." Much of the overuse or inappropriate use of these words is in contexts that intrinsically message the audience that the speaker is not trustworthy. I call the overuse or inappropriate use of these words in this context HONESTY VALIDATORS because the speaker believes they validate the truth being spoken. We need a solution to this problem. My solution is to replace these honesty validators with CLARITY VALIDATORS. Instead of trying to be honest, try to be clear. Replacing "honest," "honesty," and "honestly," with "clear," "clarity," and "clearly," produces significantly more benefit to the speaker and to the audience.
By James Meadows August 7, 2023
It's the real thing alright!
By James Meadows May 30, 2023
Reflecting on 30 years as a PC user.
By James Meadows July 26, 2020
What the Boeing 737 Max crashes teach us about training, corporate culture, and communication.