CREEPING CORPORATE ENTROPY

James Meadows • April 19, 2017

Entropy is a thermodynamics principle that is a measure of the energy that is not available for work during a thermodynamic process. A closed system evolves toward a state of maximum entropy. More broadly, entropy says that things tend to move from orderliness to disorderliness.

Entropy rings equally true when translated to a cultural context. Left to themselves, things tend to move from order to disorder. If you don’t believe me, just look in your car’s back seat, your office, your refrigerator, your garage, or your nearest teenager’s bedroom. Entropy is something that we combat daily . . . or we fail to combat it and thus succumb to it.

When we look at organizational development dynamics, we often see what I like to call creeping corporate entropy. That is when entropy is affecting groups of people, organizations, or companies. What makes creeping corporate entropy so much more invasive and persistent is the simple fact that you literally have more moving parts (called people). The pervasiveness, individuality, unpredictability, and volatility of those parts render the organization vulnerable to being less effective at combatting entropy.

One of the many negative technological effects of creeping corporate entropy is that the entire organization will experience a degradation of its technical capabilities. Garrett M. Graff writing for Bloomberg Businessweek gives us a prime example of this from the nation’s presidency (“Trump Force One” 3/20/17–3/26/17, pp. 48–53):

On [September 11, 2001], aboard Air Force One, President George W. Bush was repeatedly frustrated by antiquated communications systems. At times he was less informed than the average CNN viewer, as the plane then had no access to satellite TV. Afterward, his administration undertook a wide-ranging effort to upgrade the president’s in-flight capabilities. ” (p. 51)

That sad, surprising, and slightly humorous example reminds us that if we want our people and our organizations to be on the cutting edge, then creeping corporate entropy is something we can never ignore . . . on any level. The default setting of creeping corporate entropy is to win.

We have work to do.

By James Meadows July 13, 2026
What every front desk professional should know about credit card surcharging
By James Meadows September 7, 2025
Is a college degree still worth the investment? It depends of the path you craft.
By James Meadows August 12, 2025
You need to give serious thought to taming the tiger before you are in its cage.
By James Meadows June 8, 2025
My transparent reflection about my five-year post-layoff experience, how I navigated it, learned through it, and identified some wisdom that might inspire others.
By James Meadows June 29, 2024
The earliest days of this series present fundamentally significant leadership content.
By James Meadows August 22, 2023
What we should expect from fidelity to science.
Honesty, honest,  honestly
By James Meadows August 9, 2023
We explore the overuse or inappropriate use of the words "honest," "honesty," and "honestly." Much of the overuse or inappropriate use of these words is in contexts that intrinsically message the audience that the speaker is not trustworthy. I call the overuse or inappropriate use of these words in this context HONESTY VALIDATORS because the speaker believes they validate the truth being spoken. We need a solution to this problem. My solution is to replace these honesty validators with CLARITY VALIDATORS. Instead of trying to be honest, try to be clear. Replacing "honest," "honesty," and "honestly," with "clear," "clarity," and "clearly," produces significantly more benefit to the speaker and to the audience.
By James Meadows August 7, 2023
It's the real thing alright!
By James Meadows May 30, 2023
Reflecting on 30 years as a PC user.
By James Meadows July 26, 2020
What the Boeing 737 Max crashes teach us about training, corporate culture, and communication.