NONPROFIT DOES NOT MEAN NONSTRATEGIC

James Meadows • August 23, 2016

Every organization must balance the checkbook. This is true regardless of that organization’s mission, vision, status, and location. One interesting nuance to this truth is the distinction between for-profit and nonprofit organizations.

A for-profit company creates a strategy that ensures sufficient revenue so that the business remains profitable. An unprofitable company will not remain solvent. A nonprofit organization essentially does the same thing. In the nonprofit’s case however, the organization creates a strategy that ensures sufficient revenue so that after all the salaries, bills, and operating expenses are paid, enough money is left over to fund the mission of that organization. That’s the point; instead of generating a profit for shareholders and owners, the organization wants to generate sufficient revenue to accomplish its original purpose.

Given these scenarios, the question arises, do both types of organizations need to create the same kinds of strategies, and is that particular challenge equal for both? Historically, many nonprofits have been slow to adopt some of the same strategies that for-profit businesses have been using for a long time. However, once those same nonprofits adopt (or adapt) those strategies, most wonder why they didn’t make that decision sooner. The bottom line is that the bottom line is essential.

Diana Aviv is the CEO of the nonprofit, Feeding America. I like how she addresses the implications of these truths for the nonprofits. Most nonprofits must depend on some combination of grants, endowments, and donations. Precisely because of that coupled with the intrinsic nature of nonprofits, nonprofits often must be even more effective in how they strategize (“How Did I Get Here?: Diana Aviv.” Bloomberg Businessweek , 7/4/16–7/10/16, p. 72):

Nonprofits have to be more agile and innovative, because they’re doing everything with less resources.

Let’s face it: most nonprofits are not flush with cash and other resources. This is why it becomes even more important that nonprofits strategize with excellence. They literally cannot afford to miss the potential payoffs.

For this to happen, key officers in nonprofits as well as bench-level employees and members must be willing to assume a bold stance. They must be willing to take some risk, attempt some unorthodox approaches, and consider what the demographics and trends of their context reveal.

Your strategy is always driven by your goals, context, and circumstances. Therein lies the secrets to success for the nonprofit. That bold action must come one way or another. Failing to plan is planning to fail. And no organization wants to do that.


By James Meadows September 7, 2025
Is a college degree still worth the investment? It depends of the path you craft.
By James Meadows August 12, 2025
You need to give serious thought to taming the tiger before you are in its cage.
By James Meadows June 8, 2025
My transparent reflection about my five-year post-layoff experience, how I navigated it, learned through it, and identified some wisdom that might inspire others.
By James Meadows June 29, 2024
The earliest days of this series present fundamentally significant leadership content.
By James Meadows August 22, 2023
What we should expect from fidelity to science.
Honesty, honest,  honestly
By James Meadows August 9, 2023
We explore the overuse or inappropriate use of the words "honest," "honesty," and "honestly." Much of the overuse or inappropriate use of these words is in contexts that intrinsically message the audience that the speaker is not trustworthy. I call the overuse or inappropriate use of these words in this context HONESTY VALIDATORS because the speaker believes they validate the truth being spoken. We need a solution to this problem. My solution is to replace these honesty validators with CLARITY VALIDATORS. Instead of trying to be honest, try to be clear. Replacing "honest," "honesty," and "honestly," with "clear," "clarity," and "clearly," produces significantly more benefit to the speaker and to the audience.
By James Meadows August 7, 2023
It's the real thing alright!
By James Meadows May 30, 2023
Reflecting on 30 years as a PC user.
By James Meadows July 26, 2020
What the Boeing 737 Max crashes teach us about training, corporate culture, and communication.
By James Meadows August 13, 2019
Although anyone can and will criticize higher education, millennials are evidently smart enough to know its value. In spite of the horror stories about student loan debt, academic disasters, and wrong career turns, millennials have boasted one of the highest graduation rates of any generation to date. Generation Z may soon surpass them too as Laura A. Scione, managing editor of eCampus News reports : “ Despite growing questions around the value of college and return on investment in tuition, just 25 percent of Generation Z students say they believe they can have a rewarding career without going to college, compared to 40 percent of millennials. Eighty percent of Generation Z respondents and 74 percent of millennials agree that college either has a fair amount of value, is a good value, or is an excellent value. Only 20 percent of Generation Z students and 26 percent of millennials said college has ‘little value’ or ‘no value at all.’ ” Good for them! The statistics remain on their side—and the side of anyone who pursues higher education. Anthony P. Carnevale is the director of the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Based on his research, that trend will only continue (Gillian B. White “Those Savvy Millennials” The Atlantic , May 2015, p. 38): " In 1973, 32% of jobs did not even require a high school diploma, 9% required a bachelor’s degree, and 7% required a master’s degree or higher. It is projected that by 2020, 12% of jobs will not require a high school diploma, 24% will require a bachelor’s degree, and 11% will require a master’s degree or higher. " Derek Newton wrote an article entitled “Please Stop Asking Whether College Is Worth It” in which his opening declaration gets right to the point: “ Colleges and universities are still the best, most direct path to a good career that pays well. ” In addition to those insights, the unemployment figures consistently reveal the enduring value of higher education. The seasonally adjusted July 2019 unemployment rate for persons not having a high school diploma is 5.1% ( Bureau of Labor Statistics ). Having a high school diploma drops that rate to 3.6% and some college or a two-year degree drops it further to 3.2%. Pretty good trending, would you agree? Finally, if we look at people having a four-year degree, a graduate degree, or a doctoral degree, the unemployment rate is a low 2.2%. Higher education’s edge is especially clear when you consider the range of these numbers over the education level. Look at the two ends of the spectrum: less-than-high school (5.1%) versus a four-year degree or higher (2.2%). Consistently, regardless of the measured time, the unemployment rate for a less-than-high-school-educated worker is two to four times larger than for the college-degreed worker. This is why, when people seek my counsel about career planning, higher education remains one of my most significant emphases. Education pays. Degrees still rock. Regardless of how good or bad the economy is, regardless of how many individual academic and career disasters can be cited, and regardless of how loudly the antidegree crowd howls, you are still in a better position having a degree than not having a degree. The good news for the millennials and Generation Z is that they have arrived at the same conclusion and now they will enjoy the benefits.