GOOGLE BE GOOD

Duda Owner IONOS • June 4, 2015

Fundamental to Google’s approach to doing business is to do no evil. In Google’s statement of company philosophy, its commitment is clear (http://www.google.com/about/company/philosophy/):

You can make money without doing evil. . . .

We never manipulate rankings to put our partners higher in our search results and no one can buy better PageRank. Our users trust our objectivity and no short-term gain could ever justify breaching that trust.

I appreciate that affirmation and it makes perfect sense. Regardless of the size of your company, you need to do business ethically and honestly. Customers and noncustomers will all appreciate that commitment. Moreover, the larger your company grows, in a sense, it is even more important that these commitments ring true because the opportunities for abuse grow in size and number. (Of course smaller organizations do not have an excuse to do evil.)

Recently, the European Union accused Google of violating antitrust law by allegedly taking advantage of its size to steer consumers to its own shopping platform. The EU is also making similar accusations for how Google is using its Android mobile phone operating system, as James Kanter and Mark Scott explain (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/16/business/international/european-union-google-antitrust-case.html?_r=0):

The regulators have focused on accusations that Google diverts traffic from competitors’ rivals to favor its own comparison shopping site. That led the European Commission to issue a set of formal charges, known as a statement of objections.

How Google responds in the case—the biggest since the case against Microsoft in the 2000s—and to what degree the accusations hamper its own business or aid its rivals remain to be seen. Google holds a roughly 90 percent share in the region’s search market, and the company contends that in both web searches and Android software it plays fair.

Currently, we certainly only know a fraction of the full story. We can only hope that after the investigations occur, we find that Google is playing fair all the way. On the other hand, if it is not, then Google needs to be held completely accountable for its abuses.

To embrace ethics, one must reject evil. For Google’s sake, let’s hope that is exactly what it is doing.





By James Meadows July 13, 2026
What every front desk professional should know about credit card surcharging
By James Meadows September 7, 2025
Is a college degree still worth the investment? It depends of the path you craft.
By James Meadows August 12, 2025
You need to give serious thought to taming the tiger before you are in its cage.
By James Meadows June 8, 2025
My transparent reflection about my five-year post-layoff experience, how I navigated it, learned through it, and identified some wisdom that might inspire others.
By James Meadows June 29, 2024
The earliest days of this series present fundamentally significant leadership content.
By James Meadows August 22, 2023
What we should expect from fidelity to science.
Honesty, honest,  honestly
By James Meadows August 9, 2023
We explore the overuse or inappropriate use of the words "honest," "honesty," and "honestly." Much of the overuse or inappropriate use of these words is in contexts that intrinsically message the audience that the speaker is not trustworthy. I call the overuse or inappropriate use of these words in this context HONESTY VALIDATORS because the speaker believes they validate the truth being spoken. We need a solution to this problem. My solution is to replace these honesty validators with CLARITY VALIDATORS. Instead of trying to be honest, try to be clear. Replacing "honest," "honesty," and "honestly," with "clear," "clarity," and "clearly," produces significantly more benefit to the speaker and to the audience.
By James Meadows August 7, 2023
It's the real thing alright!
By James Meadows May 30, 2023
Reflecting on 30 years as a PC user.
By James Meadows July 26, 2020
What the Boeing 737 Max crashes teach us about training, corporate culture, and communication.