WHEN REPUTATIONS PRECEDE

Duda Owner IONOS • April 6, 2015

Fortune has published its annual “The 100 Best Companies To Work For” (Milton Moskowitz and Robert Levering, March 15, 2015, pp. 97–154). In addition to its very interesting list, Fortune included some of the latest research on how job candidates are assessing prospective companies. Survey data from McKinsey Global Institute and LinkedIn identify the factors that drive professionals when considering a job change. Here are the results (p. 108):

  1. 56%—Has a reputation as a great place to work.
  2. 20%—Is known for great products and services.
  3. 17%—Has great people.
  4. 7%—Is prestigious.

Intuitively, I thought that I knew the answer to this question, but once I saw the data, it only sealed the deal. The most important factor in assessing a prospective employer is that the company has a reputation as being a great place to work. Great products, great services, great people, and corporate prestige are all important. Nevertheless, they are all outranked by the reputation of the company as a great place to work.

When it comes to human capital, every company has its work cut out for itself. A top-quality workplace will attract and retain top-quality people. Meanwhile, the labor pool does not need to be told what its top choice is for company attractiveness.





By James Meadows July 13, 2026
What every front desk professional should know about credit card surcharging
By James Meadows September 7, 2025
Is a college degree still worth the investment? It depends of the path you craft.
By James Meadows August 12, 2025
You need to give serious thought to taming the tiger before you are in its cage.
By James Meadows June 8, 2025
My transparent reflection about my five-year post-layoff experience, how I navigated it, learned through it, and identified some wisdom that might inspire others.
By James Meadows June 29, 2024
The earliest days of this series present fundamentally significant leadership content.
By James Meadows August 22, 2023
What we should expect from fidelity to science.
Honesty, honest,  honestly
By James Meadows August 9, 2023
We explore the overuse or inappropriate use of the words "honest," "honesty," and "honestly." Much of the overuse or inappropriate use of these words is in contexts that intrinsically message the audience that the speaker is not trustworthy. I call the overuse or inappropriate use of these words in this context HONESTY VALIDATORS because the speaker believes they validate the truth being spoken. We need a solution to this problem. My solution is to replace these honesty validators with CLARITY VALIDATORS. Instead of trying to be honest, try to be clear. Replacing "honest," "honesty," and "honestly," with "clear," "clarity," and "clearly," produces significantly more benefit to the speaker and to the audience.
By James Meadows August 7, 2023
It's the real thing alright!
By James Meadows May 30, 2023
Reflecting on 30 years as a PC user.
By James Meadows July 26, 2020
What the Boeing 737 Max crashes teach us about training, corporate culture, and communication.