MAKING MONEY IN THE COAL WARS

websitebuilder • March 25, 2014

Much has been written and continues to be written about energy policy.  For almost any position you can imagine, you will find endorsers and critics.  It is an overwhelming area of study with global implications.  I do not see the debates dissipating soon.

Peabody Energy’s North Antelope Rochelle Mine (south of Gillette, Wyoming) alone kicks out almost 300,000 tons of coal every day.  Adding in its additional mines, total daily production is nearly a million tons.  Peabody Energy has no difficulty finding buyers of all that coal, as Richard Martin reports:  (“Big Coal’s Last Stand” Fortune , March 17, 2014, pp. 152–158):

Like other Big Coal companies, Peabody Energy . . . is enjoying a boomlet even as the U.S. weans itself off coal.  Hunger for the world’s dirtiest fuel is growing, especially in the developing countries of Asia—particularly India and China, where coal consumption shows little sign of slowing, at least not yet.  As gas prices have recovered, coal’s market share of U.S. electricity production has actually risen again, reaching 44% in January, about its historical level. ” (p. 154)

Given these increasingly international coal demands, Peabody Energy is pushing for new export terminals on the West Coast.  As one might expect, the ongoing debates about energy policy leave no dearth of opposition to these efforts.  Peabody Energy CEO Gregory Boyce, certainly not oblivious to environmental concerns, nonetheless views the matter pragmatically:

‘The question is not whether Asia will import more coal.  . . . It will.  The question is whether the jobs and economic benefits will accrue to the United States or to other countries.’ ” (p. 157)

Boyce is saying please, let us take advantage of the opportunities for our nation while simultaneously meeting the needs of other nations.  I certainly do not claim to know everything there is to know about the coal industry, but given the complexity of the situation, and the fact that science is continuing to assess the environmental effects of the coal industry, I lean in favor of Boyce’s position.  While I recognize the challenges of coal production environmentally, I also do not believe we can simply shut down the entire industry overnight.  I do affirm that the situation is too complicated for that to happen.

The coal wars will continue.  So will making money.  So will global expansion.  And somewhere through all this, our human ingenuity will refine our energy policy to a place that maximizes the benefits and minimizes the risks.





By James Meadows September 7, 2025
Is a college degree still worth the investment? It depends of the path you craft.
By James Meadows August 12, 2025
You need to give serious thought to taming the tiger before you are in its cage.
By James Meadows June 8, 2025
My transparent reflection about my five-year post-layoff experience, how I navigated it, learned through it, and identified some wisdom that might inspire others.
By James Meadows June 29, 2024
The earliest days of this series present fundamentally significant leadership content.
By James Meadows August 22, 2023
What we should expect from fidelity to science.
Honesty, honest,  honestly
By James Meadows August 9, 2023
We explore the overuse or inappropriate use of the words "honest," "honesty," and "honestly." Much of the overuse or inappropriate use of these words is in contexts that intrinsically message the audience that the speaker is not trustworthy. I call the overuse or inappropriate use of these words in this context HONESTY VALIDATORS because the speaker believes they validate the truth being spoken. We need a solution to this problem. My solution is to replace these honesty validators with CLARITY VALIDATORS. Instead of trying to be honest, try to be clear. Replacing "honest," "honesty," and "honestly," with "clear," "clarity," and "clearly," produces significantly more benefit to the speaker and to the audience.
By James Meadows August 7, 2023
It's the real thing alright!
By James Meadows May 30, 2023
Reflecting on 30 years as a PC user.
By James Meadows July 26, 2020
What the Boeing 737 Max crashes teach us about training, corporate culture, and communication.
By James Meadows August 13, 2019
Although anyone can and will criticize higher education, millennials are evidently smart enough to know its value. In spite of the horror stories about student loan debt, academic disasters, and wrong career turns, millennials have boasted one of the highest graduation rates of any generation to date. Generation Z may soon surpass them too as Laura A. Scione, managing editor of eCampus News reports : “ Despite growing questions around the value of college and return on investment in tuition, just 25 percent of Generation Z students say they believe they can have a rewarding career without going to college, compared to 40 percent of millennials. Eighty percent of Generation Z respondents and 74 percent of millennials agree that college either has a fair amount of value, is a good value, or is an excellent value. Only 20 percent of Generation Z students and 26 percent of millennials said college has ‘little value’ or ‘no value at all.’ ” Good for them! The statistics remain on their side—and the side of anyone who pursues higher education. Anthony P. Carnevale is the director of the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Based on his research, that trend will only continue (Gillian B. White “Those Savvy Millennials” The Atlantic , May 2015, p. 38): " In 1973, 32% of jobs did not even require a high school diploma, 9% required a bachelor’s degree, and 7% required a master’s degree or higher. It is projected that by 2020, 12% of jobs will not require a high school diploma, 24% will require a bachelor’s degree, and 11% will require a master’s degree or higher. " Derek Newton wrote an article entitled “Please Stop Asking Whether College Is Worth It” in which his opening declaration gets right to the point: “ Colleges and universities are still the best, most direct path to a good career that pays well. ” In addition to those insights, the unemployment figures consistently reveal the enduring value of higher education. The seasonally adjusted July 2019 unemployment rate for persons not having a high school diploma is 5.1% ( Bureau of Labor Statistics ). Having a high school diploma drops that rate to 3.6% and some college or a two-year degree drops it further to 3.2%. Pretty good trending, would you agree? Finally, if we look at people having a four-year degree, a graduate degree, or a doctoral degree, the unemployment rate is a low 2.2%. Higher education’s edge is especially clear when you consider the range of these numbers over the education level. Look at the two ends of the spectrum: less-than-high school (5.1%) versus a four-year degree or higher (2.2%). Consistently, regardless of the measured time, the unemployment rate for a less-than-high-school-educated worker is two to four times larger than for the college-degreed worker. This is why, when people seek my counsel about career planning, higher education remains one of my most significant emphases. Education pays. Degrees still rock. Regardless of how good or bad the economy is, regardless of how many individual academic and career disasters can be cited, and regardless of how loudly the antidegree crowd howls, you are still in a better position having a degree than not having a degree. The good news for the millennials and Generation Z is that they have arrived at the same conclusion and now they will enjoy the benefits.